USPTO serial 74581097
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
30101 FORSSA, FI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | ice hockey equipment, namely ice skates, skate blades, in-line skates, in-line blades, hockey sticks, hockey stick blades, hockey stick shafts, shoulder pads, elbow pads, shin pads, goalie pads, hockey gloves, hockey equipment bags; street hockey equipement, namely in-line skates, hockey sticks, hockey stick blades, hockey stick shafts, shoulder pads, elbow pads, shin pads, goalie pads, hockey gloves, hockey equipment bags | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |