Drawing for VALENTINO

USPTO serial 74581334

VALENTINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALENTINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILIP FORLENZA

PHILIP FORLENZA PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003perfume and cologneACTIVE—
009eyeglass cases, spectacle cases sold emptyACTIVE—
014jewelry, clocks and watchesACTIVE—
025men's, women's and children's shirts, blouses, sweaters, jackets, slacks, shorts, belts, suspenders, neckties, skirts, dresses, shoes, bathing suitsACTIVE—
042retail store services featuring clothing, footwear, jewelry, perfume, accessories and related goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 20, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 11, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 10, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 13, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance