USPTO serial 74581334
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
3012 Ca Rotterdam, NL
3012 Ca Rotterdam, NL
Curacao, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP FORLENZA
PHILIP FORLENZA PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume and cologne | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | eyeglass cases, spectacle cases sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry, clocks and watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | men's, women's and children's shirts, blouses, sweaters, jackets, slacks, shorts, belts, suspenders, neckties, skirts, dresses, shoes, bathing suits | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | retail store services featuring clothing, footwear, jewelry, perfume, accessories and related goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2001 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |