USPTO serial 74583772
PERFECT AIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFECT AIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Cohen
ROBERT B COHEN LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products, namely, hair shampoo, conditioners, styling gels, mousses and hair sprays | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electric household appliances, namely electric hair curlers, vacuum cleaners, non-electric vacuum marinating devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | portable electric fans, convection ovens, microwave ovens, hand held electric hair dryers and attachments therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by America Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by America Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named PERFECT AIRE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |