USPTO serial 74595363
MURANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MURANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAN CABILE
DAN CABILE KINT S A R L1 CHEMIN JEAN RACINE78470 MILON LA CHAPELLE,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes; toilet water; essential oils for personal use; cosmetics, namely, cold cream, eye cream, hair removing cream, night cream, skin cleansing cream, skin cream, vanishing cream, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye pencils, eye shadow, eye-brow pencils, eyeliners, facial scrubs, lip gloss, non-medicated lip balm, lipstick, skin, hair, face and body lotions, facial and foundation makeups, mascara, rouge, skin moisturizer, skin clarifiers, skin cleansing lotions; hair lotions; deodorants for personal use; facial and body soaps; hair shampoos; toothpastes; and cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |