USPTO serial 74600394
DIGITAL PLANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL PLANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
T. WILLIAM ALVEY
T WILLIAM ALVEY IXL ENTERPRISES, INC1600 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for entertainment purposes for viewing and interacting with prerecorded audiovisual and multimedia stories, not in the nature of a computer game; computer software for educational purposes at the pre-kindergarten, kindergarten, primary, secondary and post-secondary level in all subject areas; computer software for use in creating multimedia presentations; virtual reality software for use in business and for teaching and learning in a wide variety of subjects; pre-recorded programs containing a wide range of general interest information, namely, databases containing business and residential address, telephone, facsimile and electronic mail directories, encyclopedias, dictionaries, almanacs, accounting references, and databases of information relating to office productivity | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting services for the design and implementation of interactive computer systems and online services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IXL HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IXL-LOS ANGELES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Planet
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Planet
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIGITAL PLANET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |