Drawing for SYMYX

USPTO serial 74602116

SYMYX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THAYER, GARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYMYX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LOLETTA L. DARDEN

LOLETTA L DARDEN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC1533 N WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001raw superconducting ceramics for use in electronic and mechanical devices; inorganic catalysts for use in the manufacture of industrial chemicals and in the rubber and oil processing industries and for catalytic converters; phosphor materials for use in electronic displays, printers and lights; raw and processed magnetic materials for use in magnetic storage systemsACTIVE
002corrosion inhibiting paint-type coatings for commercial marine use and for use in the oil and/or gas drilling industryACTIVE
006superconducting alloys for use in electronic and mechanical devicesACTIVE
009magnets and superconducting electronic substrate circuit componentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 26, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Sep 11, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 10, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 24, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 24, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jul 6, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 6, 1998REINREINSTATED
Feb 26, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 18, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 18, 1998REINREINSTATED
Aug 7, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 24, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 4, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 27, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 8, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 10, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance