USPTO serial 74605074
JETBIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CHAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JETBIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edouard V. Rosa
EDOUARD V ROSA THE LAW OFFICE OF EDOUARD V ROSA31416 AGOURA RDSTE 220WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | boats, namely recreational jet powered personal watercraft that plane on the surface of the water by means of runners | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |