USPTO serial 74605417
E-CASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-CASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1098 VA, Amsterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNA C. SILVA
ANNA C SILVA STEINHART & FALCONER LLP333 MARKET ST STE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | data processors, computers, computer software and microcontrollers, the foregoing all used for accomplishing value and data transfers, exchanging, maintaining and storing information related to such transfers, and protecting the privacy of such transactions and information related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |