USPTO serial 74605869
COFFEE TALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANI, LALITHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COFFEE TALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK MICHAEL DWYER
PATRICK MICHAEL DWYER DWYER MARQUARDT PLLC1919 ONE UNION SQSEATTLE, WA 98101-1129UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | serial publications, namely magazines | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |