Drawing for COFFEE TALK

USPTO serial 74605869

COFFEE TALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MANI, LALITHA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COFFEE TALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK MICHAEL DWYER

PATRICK MICHAEL DWYER DWYER MARQUARDT PLLC1919 ONE UNION SQSEATTLE, WA 98101-1129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016serial publications, namely magazinesABANDONEDSep 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 10, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 22, 1996PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 15, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 15, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 1996IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Feb 6, 1996AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 14, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jun 16, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance