USPTO serial 74606186
PICTURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICTURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judson K. Champlin
JUDSON K CHAMPLIN WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY, PASTE 1600 - INTERNATIONAL CTR900 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3319Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | color computer printers | ABANDONED | Oct 4, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |