USPTO serial 74607594
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Donald Weber, Jr.
G DONALD WEBER JR LAW OFFICE OF G DONALD WEBER JR333 CITY BLVD W STE 1610ORANGE, CA 92868UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys for preschool or kindergarten age children, namely, plush toys, remote or radio controlled action toys which move and make sounds, push or pull toys which move and make sounds, battery operated action toys, spring actuated action toys which move or make sounds, multiple activity toys and building blocks, board games, manipulative and jigsaw puzzles, ride-on toys and picture and image making toys, namely, a toy comprising a board and light conducting pegs which connect therewith to form various pictures and a toy consisting of a carry case and two pages supported therein at an angle to one another such that the first page supports an image which is projected through the second page to enable the user to trace the image | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |