USPTO serial 74609368
NO BULL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO BULL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEON D. ROSEN
LEON D ROSEN FREILICH, HORNBAKER & ROSEN10960 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 1434LOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and women's clothing, namely T-shirts, casual shirts, jackets, sweatsuits, shorts, pants, and headwear comprising casual hats, headbands and visors | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |