USPTO serial 74610917
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Newport News, VA
Newport News, VA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LCD projectors with audio and video capabilities for use with computer/video/multimedia presentations | ABANDONED | Mar 10, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |