USPTO serial 74611599
INTERPRETER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERPRETER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 9JT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla J. Dolce
CARLA J DOLCE FELSMAN, BRADLEY, GUNTER & DILLON777 MAIN ST STE 2600FT WORTH, TX 76102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | hand-held electronic solid state tape recorders and players for replaying tour guide recorded messages to visitors in museums, exhibitions, theme parks and other points of interest | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |