Drawing for HEALTH ZONE

USPTO serial 74618314

HEALTH ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTH ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALAN N SUTIN

ALAN N SUTIN GREENBERG TRAURIG HOFFMAN LIPOFF ET ALMET LIFE BLDG200 PARK AVE 15TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10166

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035medical business management services to physicians' groups, namely, bookkeeping and billing services; medical personnel management services, namely, recruitment, hiring and evaluation of personnel; development and management of personnel policies and procedures; short-term and long-term business planning; development and implementation of inventory control systems and purchasing of equipment and suppliesABANDONED
036providing financial services to physicians' groups, namely, budget planning and preparation, cash management services, development of proposed fee schedules, credit recovery and collection services for physicians' groups; evaluation of insurance needs and procurement of insurance coverage for physicians' groups; administration of employee benefit plans for physicians' groupsABANDONED
042neonatology and pediatric medical care servicesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 6, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 9, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 1, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 20, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 2, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance