USPTO serial 74621349
VIVID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason A. Bernstein
JASON A BERNSTEIN BERNSTEIN & ASSOCIATES30 PERIMETER CTR E STE 121ATLANTA, GA 30346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, and instruction manuals, sold together as a unit, for use as tools in designing client server applications | ABANDONED | Apr 20, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |