USPTO serial 74621991
DON'T DRINK & DRIVE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DON'T DRINK & DRIVE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK D GIARRATANA
MARK D GIARRATANA GRANITE SQCUMMINGS & LOCKWOODP O BOX 1960NEW HAVEN, CT 06509-1960Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed matter, namely, advertisement sheets and forms created for third parties, and for use other than primarily generating public awareness of the hazards of drunk driving | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |