Drawing for HI RECORDS

USPTO serial 74622257

HI RECORDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI RECORDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY M. CLUNAN

AMY M CLUNAN STREIBICH AND SEALEBRYTON TWR STE 1011271 POPLAR AVEMEMPHIS, TN 38104-7265

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009apparatus for recording, transmitting and/or reproducing sounds and images such as phonograph records, pre-recorded tapes and compact discsABANDONEDOct 14, 1957
041licensing, publishing, recording and promotion of musical compositions, musicians, books, authors, and other works of art and authors/creators in the entertainment fieldABANDONEDOct 14, 1957

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 1997PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED
Oct 31, 1996PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Apr 24, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 6, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance