Drawing for COMPUTER MALL

USPTO serial 74629073

COMPUTER MALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTER MALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTHA P SIEGEL

MARTHA P SIEGEL MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Disseminating advertising for others and promoting the goods and services of others via on-line telecommunications networks; and electronic retailing via the global computer network in the field of computer-related products, namely, computer hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, books and instructional materialsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 10, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 10, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 26, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 17, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Feb 2, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 1998IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Mar 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 13, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jun 13, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 1996DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 25, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 25, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jan 11, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance