USPTO serial 74629073
COMPUTER MALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPUTER MALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTHA P SIEGEL
MARTHA P SIEGEL MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Disseminating advertising for others and promoting the goods and services of others via on-line telecommunications networks; and electronic retailing via the global computer network in the field of computer-related products, namely, computer hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, books and instructional materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 10, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |