USPTO serial 74631171
ANALYZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANALYZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James B. Muskal
JAMES B MUSKALTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical instruments in the nature of a system for non-invasively determining dynamic stiffness of the cervical spine, namely dynamic force applying apparatus, frequency measuring and detecting apparatus and data processing apparatus for calculating frequency response of muscular skeletal structures | ABANDONED | Jan 12, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |