USPTO serial 74635846
RACEWAY LUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RACEWAY LUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | vehicle lubrication and oil change services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |