USPTO serial 74636162
SUPER STUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CHAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER STUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal structural framing, namely studs, track, deflection clip, deflection strut, deflection track, utility angle, joist hangers, joist support clip, angle clip, end stiffener clip, web reinforcement plate, tension strap, structural hat channel, screw fasteners, radius track, boxed and I-shaped structure, brake formed structure, prefabricated frame, sheet steel, metal drywall products, namely drywall stud, drywall track, drywall hat channel, zee furring, grommet, resilient channel, cold rolled channel, knee wall bracket, galvanized rod, furring channel clip, bead and corner bead, metal trim, utility angle, hanger wire, and tie wire | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |