USPTO serial 74636214
EXPERT IN-SITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARRISON, LAKEISHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPERT IN-SITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software in the fields of entertainment and education | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2001 |
| 035 | consulting services, with respect to customer service in the nature of telephone answering techniques and consulting services with respect to business management and operation | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2001 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, training courses and seminars in the fields of customer service, education and entertainment, namely, music, art, film, comedy, literature, and animation and consulting services relating to educational classes in business management, operation, and employee training | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELECTECH CUSTOMER CARE
- Other trademarks owned by TELECTECH CUSTOMER CARE
- Other trademarks owned by TeleTech Telecommunications, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EXPERT IN-SITE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |