USPTO serial 74637182
TIGER VITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIGER VITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | food supplements | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |