USPTO serial 74637921
AUTO CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTO CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | brake fluid, power steering fluid, diesel fuel chemical additive, automobile cooling system leak sealants, automobile radiator leak sealants, radiator flush, automobile tire inflator sealers, antifreeze, gas line antifreeze, deicing preparations for vehicles, starting fluid chemical additive, octane booster fuel chemical additive, and hydraulic fluids for general use | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 1994 |
| 003 | degreasing preparations, not used in manufacturing processes, for vehicles, automobile cleaners, carburetor and choke cleaning preparations, and windshield washer fluid | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 1994 |
| 004 | non-chemical gasoline additive, all-purpose penetrating oil, motor oil, automotive lubricants, automotive gear oil, automotive greases, and non-chemical motor oil additive | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |