USPTO serial 74638085
ISP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alys Hay
ALYS HAY SKJERVEN, MORRILL, MACPHERSON, ET AL25 METRO DR STE 700SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated circuits and computer programs for use with integrated circuits | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |