Drawing for MIDWEST CITY CARD

USPTO serial 74638902

MIDWEST CITY CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIDWEST CITY CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036banking and credit card servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 27, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 29, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 18, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 15, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 26, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance