USPTO serial 74639448
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Naucalpan De Juarez, MX
Naucalpan De Juarez, MX
Naucalpan De Juarez, MX
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | undyed, untreated fabrics made of various natural or synthetic fibers or combinations thereof (more commonly known as greige goods) and fabrics of natural or synthetic fibers or combinations thereof, fully prepared for cutting and manufacturing into finished garments (more commonly known as piece goods) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |