Drawing for FIELD & STREAM

USPTO serial 74641212

FIELD & STREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIELD & STREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. Lee

PAUL A LEE TIME WARNER INCONE TIME WARNER CTR14-121NEW YORK, NY 10019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032beer, fruit drinks and fruit juices, soft drinks and drinking waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 9, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 26, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 25, 1997PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 5, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance