USPTO serial 74642172
DECO-GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DECO-GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Nolan
ROBERT S NOLAN HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCEP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | manufacturing services related to automotive parts, namely, machining and finishing and assembling automotive components made from metals, namely, cast iron, ductile iron, steel, nodular iron, aluminum, magnesium, and powder metal alloys, from plastics, glass-filled plastics, and from ceramic materials | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1994 |
| 042 | product development consultation, namely, design, development, research and testing of new products in the automotive fields for others, industrial design, engineering and research and material testing of new products for others | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |