Drawing for COFFEE TIME

USPTO serial 74645720

COFFEE TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COFFEE TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ira S. Dorman

IRA S DORMAN LAW OFFICE OF IRA S DORMAN330 ROBERTS ST STE 200EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030coffee, pastries, and donutsABANDONED
042operation of a restaurant offering coffee, pastries, and donutsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 1997PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN
Dec 18, 1997PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN
Nov 4, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 4, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 15, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 5, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance