USPTO serial 74646127
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ceramics Venture International
Shannon, County Clare, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L.S. VAN LANDINGHAM, III
DAVID J FRENCHP O BOX 2486 STATION DOTTAWA, ON K1P 5W6CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | titanium-bsed metal matrix composite material, strengthened by a ceramic consitiuent, namely titanium silicide, in the form of ingots, billots or near net shapes used to manufacture industrial components | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | components for internal combustion engines, namely parts or near net shapes for piston heads, cylinder liners (piston sleeves) and other engines components, namely glow plugs, pre-combustion chambers, cylinder liners (piston sleeves), cylinder head plates, exhaust ports, rocket arm tips, tappets, bucket discs, value guides and valve seats, turbo charger casings, piston rings, fuel injectors, connecting rods, roller cam followers, piston pins, exhaust port liners; and components for gas turbines, namely gas turbine wheels, turbine blades and turbine impeller for compressors | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |