USPTO serial 74647983
MIRROR MESSAGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2715897Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIRROR MESSAGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Durham, NH
New Durham, NH
Innovative Advertising Products, Inc.
New Durham, NH
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Advertising Products, Inc.
Innovative Advertising Products, Inc.
New Durham, NH
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Advertising Products, Inc.
New Durham, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresa C. Tucker
TERESA C TUCKER HAYES, SOLOWAY, HENNESSEY, ET AL175 CANAL STMANCHESTER, NH 03101-2335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | blank or partially printed items, namely, reminder cards, greeting cards, postcards, business cards, stickers, and/or labels made from paper, plastics, foil, or other synthetic materials, not of textile, note pads, writing pads, mounted and unmounted photographs, photographic prints, illustrations, bookmarks, stationery, envelopes, mailing inserts, and/or invoices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seavers, Luke J.
- Other trademarks owned by Luke Arthur Seavers Hovland
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Advertising Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Advertising Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Seavers, Luke J.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named MIRROR MESSAGES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |