USPTO serial 74648858
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | hand operated tools, namely hand operated hydraulic compression tool; hydraulic compression head, die adaptor, die set comprised of hexagonal dies for copper table lug and hexagonal dies for solderless terminal; hand operated hydraulic cutters, hydraulic cutter head, hydraulic punch driver, punch, hydraulic power puncher, hydraulic hand pump, hydraulic foot pump, cable cutters, rod and wire cutter, ratcheting cable cutter, rotary cable stripper, PVC pipe cutter, wire stripper and cutters, snip cutters, IC pulling tool for use in electrical installation and/or repair, ratchet control crimping tool, heavy duty crimping tool, modular tools for use in electrical installation and/or repair, cable tie tensioning tool, replacement blade for stripper, coaxial cable stripper | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |