USPTO serial 74649766
TELE-TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELE-TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Reston, VA
Reston, VA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production of video-on-demand television programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV MEDIA, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV
- Other trademarks owned by BNP PARTNERS, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TELE-TV
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |