USPTO serial 74650282
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FOSTER CITY, CA
FOSTER CITY, CA
FRAMINGHAM, MA
Hoboken, NJ
International Data Group, Inc.
Framingham, MA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books in the field of computers, communications and information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |