USPTO serial 74651270
BRET "HITMAN" HART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 19, 2002
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BRET "HITMAN" HART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, books, [pamphlets brochures and cartoon comic books and periodical publications, namely, magazines, newsletters and cartoon comic books,] all on the general subjects of wrestling, physical fitness, and exercise; posters featuring wrestlers and promoting wrestling exhibitions; [pens and pencils;] stickers; [calendars; coloring books;] trading cards; [cartoon strips] | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | [headbands, sweatbands, Halloween and masquerade costumes, caps] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | [games, namely,] [electronic games, video game cartridges,] [and computer game cartridges] [and cassettes; ] toys, namely, action figures | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | live sporting exhibition featuring wrestling contests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1056648 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 1056648 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 1056648 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bret Hart
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BRET "HITMAN" HART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |