USPTO serial 74651442
VIGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Wayne Liauh
W WAYNE LIAUH LAW OFFICE OF LIAUH & ASSOCIATES4224 WAIALAE AVE STE 5-388HONOLULU, HI 96816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer, fruit juices, aerated water, mineral water, soda water, sarsaparilla, tomato juices, lemonades, vegetable juices, soft drinks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |