USPTO serial 74651589
SYSTEM OBJECT MODEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYSTEM OBJECT MODEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software in the field of language neutral object oriented programming technology for assembling and interfacing software components in an operating program | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |