USPTO serial 74652199
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Milton, Ontario, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | satellite receivers, dishes, and other related equipment, namely low noise block down converters, actuators, feeds (interconnectors between antenna and cables), wireless phone jacks, remote integrated receiver extender, video senders, satellite dish/chimney mount kit, surge protectors, universal remote controls, in-line amplifier, antenna kit-mount low noise block feeds, cable clips, cable ties, audio video cables, coaxial cables, self installation kits, digital distribution splitters and antennas | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | satellite services, namely leasing satellite dishes and receivers | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | SATELLITE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | satellite services, namely satellite programming services in the form of video, audio, text and other information data; and services of selling satellite receivers, dishes and other related reception equipment | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |