USPTO serial 74653917
TEXTURE ATTRIBUTE CHALLENGE KIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEXTURE ATTRIBUTE CHALLENGE KIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold D. Jastram
HAROLD D JASTRAM OPPENHEIMER, WOLFF & DONNELLY3400 PLZ VII45 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | diagnostic kits comprised primarily of food grade material having known viscosity, cohesion and related food texture qualities for use in measuring permanent and temporary chewing and swallowing disorders | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-Diet Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-Diet Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named TEXTURE ATTRIBUTE CHALLENGE KIT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |