Drawing for SAIJO

USPTO serial 74654634

SAIJO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1984837Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 2, 1996
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SAIJO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. William Beard, Jr., Bruce W. Slayden II, Thomas R. Felger, Barton E. Showalter, Paula D. Heyman, Priscilla Dunckel

R. William Beard, Jr., Bruce W. Slayden II, Thomas Baker Botts L.L.P.98 San Jacinto Blvd.1500 San Jacinto CenterAustin, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008hair-cutting shearsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2007CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9โ€”
Mar 29, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 19, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIPโ€”
Mar 7, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Dec 26, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 21, 2001PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIREDโ€”
Aug 21, 20018.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jul 9, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILEDโ€”
Jul 2, 1996R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 10, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Mar 28, 1996IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTEDโ€”
Mar 25, 1996AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Mar 11, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Mar 1, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Mar 1, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILEDโ€”
Sep 7, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance