USPTO serial 74655211
SPEED-COTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEED-COTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | oil paint, Japanese lacquer and lacquer in the nature of a coating, chip, fluorescent paint, synthetic resin coating, rust inhibiting paint, water paint, wood stain, fire-retardant paint, chemically resistant paint, putty for use as a coating, drier coating thinner, water-retardant paint, and varnish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |