USPTO serial 74655381
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pomeroy, County Tyrone, BT70 2RX, IE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | mineral and aerated waters, spring water; fruit juices; fruit drinks; vegetable juices; vegetable drinks; flavored fruit juices; flavored vegetable juices; carbonated fruit juices and vegetable juices; carbonated fruit drinks and vegetable drinks; non-carbonated fruit juices and vegetable juices; and non-carbonated fruit drinks and vegetable drinks | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |