USPTO serial 74657225
VIVA LIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVA LIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS T. CHAN
THOMAS T CHAN CHAN LAW GROUP PLCP O BOX 79159LOS ANGELES, CA 90079-0159UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional supplements, namely vitamins, amino acids and combinations of same | ABANDONED | May 16, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |