USPTO serial 74657464
NEW YORK WAYS GALLERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEW YORK WAYS GALLERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rochester Hills, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | backpacks, duffel bags, carry-on bags, change purses, document cases, garment bags for travel, hand bags, luggage, pouches (drawstring and felt), purses, tote bags, travelling bags, waist pouches, wallets, and toiletry cases sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |