Drawing for NEW YORK WAYS GALLERY

USPTO serial 74657464

NEW YORK WAYS GALLERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW YORK WAYS GALLERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce A. Tassan

BRUCE A TASSAN JACKSON & KELLY2401 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018backpacks, duffel bags, carry-on bags, change purses, document cases, garment bags for travel, hand bags, luggage, pouches (drawstring and felt), purses, tote bags, travelling bags, waist pouches, wallets, and toiletry cases sold emptyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 10, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 6, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 6, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 11, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 10, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 24, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance