Drawing for KNIGHT HAWK

USPTO serial 74659127

KNIGHT HAWK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KNIGHT HAWK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald S. Gardner

DONALD S GARDNER VAN DYKE, GARDNER, LINN & BURKHART, LLPSTE 2072851 CHARLEVOIX DR S EGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001adhesives for flooring, wall board, wall panels, construction and industrial use; and roofing glueACTIVE—
002paints for roofs, rustproofing applications, automotive/vehicle applications, and/or recreational vehicles; and aluminum paints for use on roofs, siding, fencing, recreational vehicles, and mobile homesACTIVE—
008trowel applicators for coatings and driveway sealersACTIVE—
016paint applicator rollers and brushes for coatings and driveway sealersACTIVE—
017caulkings and sealants for roofs, recreational vehicles, building and/or construction or industrial useACTIVE—
019asphalt based roof and foundation coatings, roof resurfacers, roof cements, and elastomeric roof coatingsACTIVE—
021squeegee for coatings and driveway sealersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 28, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 5, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 5, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 5, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance