USPTO serial 74664675
INFOCASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFOCASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan H. Levine
ALAN H LEVINE LEVINE & MANDELBAUM444 MADISON AVE35TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | media for storing and exchanging information as property, namely, magnetic disks, magnetic cards, optical disks, magneto-optical discs, magnetic tapes, microcircuits, and paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 11, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |