USPTO serial 74670937
NUTRILICIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2000
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NUTRILICIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rudolph P. Hofmann, Jr.
CAROLYN M SANDBERG LINDQUIST & VENNUM PLLP4200 IDS CTR 80 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | fruit juices, sparkling water and soft drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 9, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |