USPTO serial 74677189
RHINOTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2149618Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 1998
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RHINOTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RHINOTEK COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC.
CARSON, CA
Carson, CA
CHICAGO, IL
Carson, CA
Carson, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROHIT SHENDRIKAR
ROHIT SHENDRIKAR MITCHELL, SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | office, computer and business supplies, namely, laser printer toner cartridges, inkjet printer ink cartridges (new and recycled), copier toner, copier developer, fax ink cartridges, and fax toner cartridges | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1997 |
| 016 | office, computer and business supplies, namely, computer printer ribbons, printer ribbons for fax machines, thermal fax paper, bond fax paper, printer paper, namely, continuous form feed paper, cut sheet paper, cash register and calculator rolls, plotter paper, and plotter velum paper | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RHINOTEK COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Gerald Chamales Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Gerald Chamales Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Gerald Chamales Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named RHINOTEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |